{"CACHEDAT":"2026-04-14 05:05:10","SLUG":"private-car-use-vs-public-transport-expansionprivate-car-use-vs-public-transport-expansion-XeLVcSVvja","MARKDOWN":"# Activity Design with Bloom\n\n ![](/api/attachments.redirect?id=58231e3e-da35-4c50-90e6-821098d26c17 \" =1596x482\")\n\n ![](/api/attachments.redirect?id=e26e61bb-4b42-4d49-aeb9-d9aa2d5f7759 \" =1596x482\")\n\n ![](/api/attachments.redirect?id=69bc0df7-3bd4-4a05-8d7d-55b81c3abc30 \" =1596x482\")\n\n ![](/api/attachments.redirect?id=e9e552e1-29cb-4ec0-9883-10a60552200d \" =1596x482\")\n\n ![](/api/attachments.redirect?id=b32c77fe-6f90-43ad-a5d1-624f6a5fed51 \" =1596x482\")\n\n ![](/api/attachments.redirect?id=343048df-37b9-435a-8911-468907329f23 \" =1596x482\") ![](/api/attachments.redirect?id=080a8acd-e73d-4c22-85d9-5215d87c3098 \" =1596x482\")\n\n\n# Activity 1\n\n## In groups, examine the way different lobby groups address social justice, freedom, and sustainability in their press releases on raising the price of \"DeutschlandTicket\" . \n\n## or?: In groups, compare the positions of different lobby groups in terms of social justice, freedom, and sustainability in their press releases on raising the price of \"DeutschlandTicket\". \n\n\n:::success\n\n:::\n\n|   |  Social justice | Freedom | Sustainability |   |\n|-----|-----------------|---------|-----------------|-----|\n|  Greenpeace |  Deutschlandticket = fair access for low-income groups; higher prices exclude families & poorer citizens | less focus on individual freedom (private car not central); collective mobility is prioritized. |  lower prices → more ÖPNV use → reduced CO₂, supports climate goals |   |\n| VDV (Verband Deutscher Verkehrsunternehmen) | affordable tickets improve access but funding must be secured long-term | less focus on individual car choice; focus is instead on reliability and accessibility of ÖPNV | both environmental and financial sustainability: stable ticket prices keep demand high, but funding must cover costs. |   |\n|  Wirtschaftsrat / VDA | almost no focus on social equality; priority is on economy and competitivenes | car as symbol of personal freedom and independence | more focus on tech solutions (e-fuels, e-cars) instead of ÖPNV |   |\n\n\n# Activity 2 (Science)\n\n## Classify chemical substances emitted by fuel cars in atmosphere according to IUPAC Classification.\n\nBloom's verb: To classify\n\n\n:::success\nModel Solution\n\n:::\n\nChemical substances emitted by fuel cars in atmosphere can be classified in:\n\n* Non-metal (or acid) oxides\n* Alifatic hydrocarbons\n* Aromatic hydrocarbons\n* (…..and so on)\n\n# English:\n\nYour group is either Team Car or Team Public Transport. Organise your arguments! Use these ideas: cost, convenience, environment, comfort. Try to convince the other group. Defend your arguments. Use the following phrases:\n\n* I believe that...\n* One advantage is that...\n* On the other hand...\n* That's not true, because...\n\n\nModel solution: pros and cons of each category\n\nPrivate cars: \n\nPros:\n\n* convenience: door-to-door travel, no waiting for schedules, leave when you want, go where you want, time-saving in rural or poorly connected areas\n* comfort: personal space, climate control, no strangers\n\nCons:\n\n* cost: fuel, maintenance, insurance, parking fees, depreciation\n* environment: higher carbon emissions per person\n* convenience: finding parking space can be difficult, there can be traffic jams\n\nPublic transport: \n\nPros:\n\n* environment: lower emissions per passenger, less cars on roads\n* cost: generally cheaper than owning a car\n* convenience: you can read or relax while commuting\n\nCons:\n\n* comfort: not always clean and comfortable, can be crowded, poor access in rural areas\n* convenience: limited flexibility, fixed routes and schedules, delays","HTML":"

Activity Design with Bloom

\n

\"\"

\n

\"\"

\n

\"\"

\n

\"\"

\n

\"\"

\n

\"\" \"\"

\n

Activity 1

\n

In groups, examine the way different lobby groups address social justice, freedom, and sustainability in their press releases on raising the price of "DeutschlandTicket" .

\n

or?: In groups, compare the positions of different lobby groups in terms of social justice, freedom, and sustainability in their press releases on raising the price of "DeutschlandTicket".

\n
\n
Success
\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
  Social justiceFreedomSustainability 
 Greenpeace Deutschlandticket = fair access for low-income groups; higher prices exclude families & poorer citizensless focus on individual freedom (private car not central); collective mobility is prioritized. lower prices → more ÖPNV use → reduced CO₂, supports climate goals 
VDV (Verband Deutscher Verkehrsunternehmen)affordable tickets improve access but funding must be secured long-termless focus on individual car choice; focus is instead on reliability and accessibility of ÖPNVboth environmental and financial sustainability: stable ticket prices keep demand high, but funding must cover costs. 
 Wirtschaftsrat / VDAalmost no focus on social equality; priority is on economy and competitivenescar as symbol of personal freedom and independencemore focus on tech solutions (e-fuels, e-cars) instead of ÖPNV 
\n

Activity 2 (Science)

\n

Classify chemical substances emitted by fuel cars in atmosphere according to IUPAC Classification.

\n

Bloom's verb: To classify

\n
\n
Success
\n

Model Solution

\n
\n

Chemical substances emitted by fuel cars in atmosphere can be classified in:

\n\n

English:

\n

Your group is either Team Car or Team Public Transport. Organise your arguments! Use these ideas: cost, convenience, environment, comfort. Try to convince the other group. Defend your arguments. Use the following phrases:

\n\n

Model solution: pros and cons of each category

\n

Private cars:

\n

Pros:

\n\n

Cons:

\n\n

Public transport:

\n

Pros:

\n\n

Cons:

\n","UPDATEDAT":"2025-09-03T12:59:07.935Z","ID":"fb0c5431-a8a1-4472-acef-e805da561aa6","TITLE":"Private car use vs. public transport expansionPrivate car use vs. public transport expansion"}