Ammianus uses dramatic language to make the events seem dangerous and chaotic. The Huns are compared to a "snowstorm", which creates the image of an unstoppable disaster. At first, the Goths are shown as suffering refugees escaping famine and fear, which may create sympathy in the reader. Later, however, they are described as violent people who "plundered villages" and "killed people regardless of age or sex", making them seem dangerous.
\nRoman officials are presented negatively as well. Ammianus says they failed to organise or supply the Goths properly and used "shameful trading practices". This creates the impression that Roman corruption and poor leadership helped cause the conflict. Overall, the source encourages the reader to see both the migration and the Roman response as a growing catastrophe.
\nThe source is partly reliable because it describes real events and also criticises both the Goths and the Romans. However, it mainly reflects a Roman point of view, since Gothic voices are missing. The emotional and dramatic language may also exaggerate the danger and violence.
\nThe source seems intended not only to inform but also to warn readers about disorder, invasion, and poor Roman leadership. It is useful for understanding Roman attitudes toward the Gothic migration, but it has limitations because it presents events mostly from one side and uses language designed to influence the reader emotionally.
","UPDATEDAT":"2026-05-14T08:55:53.746Z","ID":"35b1fddc-8981-4e53-a518-abe4c0e8ee56","TITLE":"Model Solution"}