{"CACHEDAT":"2026-04-14 04:31:31","SLUG":"feedback-open-questions-TKzK9EQBe7","MARKDOWN":"Carina & Johanna: \n\n* In general: very clear structure, checklists are highlighted, which is great \ud83d\ude0a \n* Glossary Critical Thinking: Would be helpful to explain the idioms/terms on the \"Checklist Logical Fallacies\", e.g., ad populum, red herring → of course, you can google it (and we did) but maybe it would be nice to provide an explanation within the checklist \n  * also maybe add whataboutism (?)\n* Make Up Your Mind: Impact: Categories could be more strongly related to the levels, e.g., income inequality on the individual level/community level\n\n\nAnna O.\n\nOverall, I find the glossary clear and helpful. The terms are well-explained and specific checklists helped me to understand it. I found the terms which weren't clear to me during previous activity and the glossary helped me to understand everything. \n\n\nAntibiotics Group (Anna, Alex, Maria, Sebastian)\n\n* In general the glossary seems very helpful, because all the relevant difficult terms are explained in a detailed and understandable way\n* It would be nice to have a separate category for all \"checklist-entries\", because right now they are in between the definitions of the glossary\n\n  \\\n  \\\n\n\nEngineered babies group \n\n* Generally: Much useful information and helpful that the checklists were highlighted. \n\n\n* Click and think critically: We missed a definition for \"logical fallacies\" and the points linked to it as these were mostly unfamiliar (e.g. straw man argument, red herrings, etc.) \n* Make up your mind: The point about \"alternative format\" was a bit confusing as it included 58 points - should this have been divided into sub-categories? It was quite overwhelming with all these points. \n\n\n* Under open up your mind: perhaps provide definition for \"search query\"\n* Under click and think critically in the verbal cues that indicate arguments and evidence/examples: I really found the parentheses with examples were very helpful as well as the highlighted words. If they could be incorporated in other categories that would be very helpful.\n\n  \\","HTML":"<style>.scilmi-outline-content h1,.scilmi-outline-content h2{font-weight:700}.scilmi-outline-content .badge-scilmi{background:#0d6efd;color:#fff;padding:2px 8px;border-radius:99px;}</style><p>Carina &amp; Johanna:</p>\n<ul>\n<li>In general: very clear structure, checklists are highlighted, which is great \ud83d\ude0a</li>\n<li>Glossary Critical Thinking: Would be helpful to explain the idioms/terms on the &quot;Checklist Logical Fallacies&quot;, e.g., ad populum, red herring → of course, you can google it (and we did) but maybe it would be nice to provide an explanation within the <a href=\"/checklists\">checklist</a></li>\n<li>also maybe add whataboutism (?)</li>\n<li>Make Up Your Mind: Impact: Categories could be more strongly related to the levels, e.g., income inequality on the individual level/community level</li>\n</ul>\n<p>Anna O.</p>\n<p>Overall, I find the glossary clear and helpful. The terms are well-explained and specific checklists helped me to understand it. I found the terms which weren't clear to me during previous activity and the glossary helped me to understand everything.</p>\n<p>Antibiotics Group (Anna, Alex, Maria, Sebastian)</p>\n<ul>\n<li>In general the glossary seems very helpful, because all the relevant difficult terms are explained in a detailed and understandable way</li>\n<li>It would be nice to have a separate category for all &quot;checklist-entries&quot;, because right now they are in between the definitions of the glossary</li>\n</ul>\n<p>Engineered babies group</p>\n<ul>\n<li>Generally: Much useful information and helpful that the checklists were highlighted.</li>\n</ul>\n<ul>\n<li>Click and think critically: We missed a definition for &quot;logical fallacies&quot; and the points linked to it as these were mostly unfamiliar (e.g. straw man argument, red herrings, etc.)</li>\n<li>Make up your mind: The point about &quot;alternative format&quot; was a bit confusing as it included 58 points - should this have been divided into sub-categories? It was quite overwhelming with all these points.</li>\n</ul>\n<ul>\n<li>Under open up your mind: perhaps provide definition for &quot;search query&quot;</li>\n<li>Under click and think critically in the verbal cues that indicate arguments and evidence/examples: I really found the parentheses with examples were very helpful as well as the highlighted words. If they could be incorporated in other categories that would be very helpful.</li>\n</ul>","UPDATEDAT":"2026-01-07T13:27:03.536Z","ID":"cfddd513-9b5a-4234-96e8-94d4c33a79c0","TITLE":"Feedback, Open Questions, ..."}