{"CACHEDAT":"2026-06-05 16:21:01","SLUG":"fiamengo-daria-grjxJKzfAv","MARKDOWN":"# Lesson title: Science is playing god\n\n## Lesson sequence title: Future Baby\n\nLesson no. 2 / 3\n\n### SSI: Should society allow designer babies to improve future generations?\n\n# Subject: ESL\n\n## Subject-specific learning goals / competences / curriculum content\n\nLearning objective: listen and understand a longer authentic recording. Acquire new or complex words. Discuss a controversial topic.\n\nDiscourse competences: using cohesion and coherence effectively. Strategic competence: using paraphrasing where necessary.\n\n## Learner age range: 15-18\n\n## Year of subject learning: 11th year\n\n# Lesson context\n\n## Before HOW activity\n\nElicit from the students cases where science might be playing God in the sense that it can create or intervene in human existence.\n\nListening to a video from The Guardian [**The biggest revolution in gene editing: Crispr-Cas9 explained**](https://www.theguardian.com/science/video/2019/mar/28/the-biggest-revolution-in-gene-editing-crispr-cas9-explained-video?utm_source=chatgpt.com)\n\n* Answer multiple-choice comprehension questions and acquire new vocabulary.\n\n## After HOW activity\n\nStudents use the tables to write a short paragraph (80-100 words) giving their personal position.\n\nThe paragraph must:\n\n* include at least TWO scientific facts from the video,\n* include at least ONE emotional phrase from the video,\n* explain your personal values or interests.\n\n# HOW Activity\n\n## Duration in minutes: 15\n\n## MSL Domain: Make up your mind\n\n### Learning goal: **Take your stand**\n\n### **Form your viewpoint by weighing evidence, values, and trade-offs**\n\n\n### ==Weigh the scientific evidence against your personal needs and interests==\n\n## HOW activity instruction\n\nComplete the table ranking the values from the most important to the least important:\n\n| Value / Personal Interest | Rank |\n|---------------------------|------|\n| Preventing disease | |\n| Safety and avoiding risks | |\n| Scientific progress | |\n| Equality and fairness | |\n| Freedom for parents to choose | |\n\nCompare your table with a partner. Are your values the same or different?\n\nComplete the table by comparing the phrases to the personal value they connect to:\n\n| Evidence or Emotional Phrase | Which Personal Value Does It Connect To? | How Strongly Does It Affect Your Opinion? |\n|------------------------------|------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|\n| \"CRISPR may prevent inherited diseases.\" | | |\n| \"mistakes in gene editing can occur\" | | |\n| \"designer babies\" | | |\n| \"changes could affect future generations\" | | |\n| \"a revolutionary breakthrough\" | | |\n\nExamine how strongly the language from the video affects your opinion by ranking it 1-5.\n\n### Suggested social form\n\nteacher-led, individual, pair work.\n\n### Required infrastructure\n\ninternet access, screen, speakers, worksheet with comprehension questions, worksheet with tables for the HOW activity.","HTML":"

Lesson title: Science is playing god

\n

Lesson sequence title: Future Baby

\n

Lesson no. 2 / 3

\n

SSI: Should society allow designer babies to improve future generations?

\n

Subject: ESL

\n

Subject-specific learning goals / competences / curriculum content

\n

Learning objective: listen and understand a longer authentic recording. Acquire new or complex words. Discuss a controversial topic.

\n

Discourse competences: using cohesion and coherence effectively. Strategic competence: using paraphrasing where necessary.

\n

Learner age range: 15-18

\n

Year of subject learning: 11th year

\n

Lesson context

\n

Before HOW activity

\n

Elicit from the students cases where science might be playing God in the sense that it can create or intervene in human existence.

\n

Listening to a video from The Guardian source=chatgpt.com\" target=\"blank\" rel=\"noopener\">The biggest revolution in gene editing: Crispr-Cas9 explained

\n\n

After HOW activity

\n

Students use the tables to write a short paragraph (80-100 words) giving their personal position.

\n

The paragraph must:

\n\n

HOW Activity

\n

Duration in minutes: 15

\n

MSL Domain: Make up your mind

\n

Learning goal: Take your stand

\n

Form your viewpoint by weighing evidence, values, and trade-offs

\n

Weigh the scientific evidence against your personal needs and interests

\n

HOW activity instruction

\n

Complete the table ranking the values from the most important to the least important:

\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Value / Personal InterestRank
Preventing disease
Safety and avoiding risks
Scientific progress
Equality and fairness
Freedom for parents to choose
\n

Compare your table with a partner. Are your values the same or different?

\n

Complete the table by comparing the phrases to the personal value they connect to:

\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Evidence or Emotional PhraseWhich Personal Value Does It Connect To?How Strongly Does It Affect Your Opinion?
"CRISPR may prevent inherited diseases."
"mistakes in gene editing can occur"
"designer babies"
"changes could affect future generations"
"a revolutionary breakthrough"
\n

Examine how strongly the language from the video affects your opinion by ranking it 1-5.

\n

Suggested social form

\n

teacher-led, individual, pair work.

\n

Required infrastructure

\n

internet access, screen, speakers, worksheet with comprehension questions, worksheet with tables for the HOW activity.

","UPDATEDAT":"2026-05-15T08:51:32.218Z","ID":"9cd275a6-9054-42b9-949a-b45948b9e78f","TITLE":"Fiamengo, Daria"}