{"CACHEDAT":"2026-04-14 05:03:08","SLUG":"overfishing-and-sustainable-marine-protection-NQahnoyupb","MARKDOWN":"# Activity Design with Bloom\n\n ![](/api/attachments.redirect?id=58231e3e-da35-4c50-90e6-821098d26c17 \" =1596x482\")\n\n ![](/api/attachments.redirect?id=e26e61bb-4b42-4d49-aeb9-d9aa2d5f7759 \" =1596x482\")\n\n ![](/api/attachments.redirect?id=69bc0df7-3bd4-4a05-8d7d-55b81c3abc30 \" =1596x482\")\n\n ![](/api/attachments.redirect?id=e9e552e1-29cb-4ec0-9883-10a60552200d \" =1596x482\")\n\n ![](/api/attachments.redirect?id=b32c77fe-6f90-43ad-a5d1-624f6a5fed51 \" =1596x482\")\n\n ![](/api/attachments.redirect?id=343048df-37b9-435a-8911-468907329f23 \" =1596x482\") ![](/api/attachments.redirect?id=080a8acd-e73d-4c22-85d9-5215d87c3098 \" =1596x482\")\n\n\n# Activity 1\n\nrecognize\n\n\n\n:::success\nModel Solution: Fact or Opinion? Students are expected to identify statements from the video and clearly state whether each one is a fact or an opinion, giving a short reason for their choice.\n\n:::\n\n\n# Activity 2\n\n## summarize \n\n\n\n:::success\nModel Solution spot the bias. Students are expected to summarize what makes a statement biased, explaining briefly if it shows exaggeration, emotional appeal, framing, or loaded language.\n\n:::\n\n\n### Activitity 3: Should Norway limit fishing even more?\n\n**Competence Domain:**\\nMake up your mind – Evaluate the scientific and social dimension to create an informed opinion on a socio-scientific issue.\n\n**Learning Objective:**\\nEvaluate the trade-offs between the scientific, social and ethical dimensions.\n\n\n---\n\n#### Activity (15 min)\n\n\n1. **Input (3 min):**\\nTeacher presents briefly two perspectives:\n\n* *Scientific:* Overfishing threatens fish stocks and ecosystems.\n* *Social:* Fishing provides jobs, income, and is part of Norwegian culture.\n\n\n2. **Group discussion (7 min):**\\nLlist **one advantage** and **one disadvantage** of limiting fishing. \n\n Discuss which argument they find strongest.\n3. **Take a stand (5 min):**\\nEach student writes one short statement:\\n*\"I think Norway should/should not limit fishing more because…\"*\\n– include **one scientific** and **one social argument**.","HTML":"

Activity Design with Bloom

\n

\"\"

\n

\"\"

\n

\"\"

\n

\"\"

\n

\"\"

\n

\"\" \"\"

\n

Activity 1

\n

recognize

\n
\n
Success
\n

Model Solution: Fact or Opinion? Students are expected to identify statements from the video and clearly state whether each one is a fact or an opinion, giving a short reason for their choice.

\n
\n

Activity 2

\n

summarize

\n
\n
Success
\n

Model Solution spot the bias. Students are expected to summarize what makes a statement biased, explaining briefly if it shows exaggeration, emotional appeal, framing, or loaded language.

\n
\n

Activitity 3: Should Norway limit fishing even more?

\n

Competence Domain:\\nMake up your mind – Evaluate the scientific and social dimension to create an informed opinion on a socio-scientific issue.

\n

Learning Objective:\\nEvaluate the trade-offs between the scientific, social and ethical dimensions.

\n
\n

Activity (15 min)

\n
    \n
  1. Input (3 min):\\nTeacher presents briefly two perspectives:
    2. \n
\n\n
    \n
  1. Group discussion (7 min):\\nLlist one advantage and one disadvantage of limiting fishing.
    2. \n
\n

Discuss which argument they find strongest.

\n
    \n
  1. Take a stand (5 min):\\nEach student writes one short statement:\\n"I think Norway should/should not limit fishing more because…"\\n– include one scientific and one social argument.
    2. \n
","UPDATEDAT":"2025-09-04T12:24:45.899Z","ID":"a5f358b2-5beb-4815-a82a-249af6a2c9da","TITLE":"Overfishing and sustainable marine protection"}