{"CACHEDAT":"2026-04-14 03:25:08","SLUG":"formative-feedback-WG3xzuFD6A","MARKDOWN":"# Description of the strategy\n\nFormative feedback is a continuous and interactive strategy that **provides students with specific guidance to improve while learning is still in progress**.\n\nRather than focusing on grades, it helps students understand what they are doing well, what needs improvement, and how to move forward.\n\nThe strategy fosters self-regulation, critical reflection, and awareness of personal progress, making it especially effective in inclusive classrooms.\n\nThis feedback can come from various sources and aims to motivate learners, clarify their current position, and guide them toward their learning goals.\n\nFurther, it helps teachers adapt their teaching based on the learners' needs. After all, **it's intended to be helpful for both parties**. \n\nAccording to Hattie, to be efficient, feedback requires an activity and a product. \n\n# Estimated Effectivity\n\nEffect size refers to the magnitude of the impact of formative feedback on student learning. It is a measure of how much a student´s performance or understanding improves as a direct result of receiving formative feedback. \n\nFormative assessment methods have some of the highest effect sizes found in education. **High - quality feedback has more effect on the weakest learners**. \n\nIn Hattie's study, students receiving feedback of any kind on their work has an **effect size of 0.81**. \n\nIn Marzano's article, giving students feedback on the processes and strategies they were using to complete a specific task has an effect size of 0.74. \n\n# Underlying Ideas\n\nAccording to John Hattie and Shirley Clarke, feedback can be undertsood as \"information about the task that fills a gap between what is understood and what is aimed to be understood\".\n\nSocioconstructivism: feedback is based on the idea that knowledge is constructed through social interaction. In this sense, feedback activates cognitive and metacognitive processes and becomes a tool for mediating learning.\n\nZone of proximal development theory of Vygotsky: feedback can be placed just above the learner´s current level, offering support for progress\n\nUniversal Design for Learning (UDL): **Feedback should be individualised, clear and understandable for each learner, adapted to their abilities and learning styles**.\n\n# Potential Challenges, Risks or Limitations\n\nChallenges: it requires time and teacher formation to be effective; it may not be understood or interpreted correctly by learners; if poorly implemented, it can lead to dependency rather than autonomy and, in environments with a high content load or high ratios, it can be difficult to implement in a consistent and personalised way.\n\nFour main risks:\n\n* The assessment is not aligned with intended learning outcomes\n* There is too little assessment, which means that some aims are not being evaluated\n* There is too much assessment, at the expense of actual teaching\n* The assessment, is deficit – driven, with too much attention given to looking for problems in the learners, rather than with the teaching strategies\n\nAlso, if not handled carefully, it can: \n\n* Lead to stress and de – motivate\n* Not be understood by learners\n* Be too little and too late\n* Be too dominated by tests\n* Place too much responsibility on the learners for any lack of achievement, rather than sharing responsibility with educators\n\n# Needs supported by the strategy (from wiki)\n\nThe strategy responds to the need for support in executive functioning by helping learners develop self-monitoring and self-regulation skills. It guides students in identifying their mistakes, recognising their achievements and planning the next steps. This again helps foster greater independence and a sense of ownership of the learning process.\n\nNext, it also addresses the need for support in communication, social interaction and participation, as it turns assessment into a dialogic and collaborative process. Here, learners are not passive receivers of information but rather active participants in their own development.\n\nFurther, it is closely linked to motivational needs. By clarifying expectations and recognising progress, it helps to maintain motivation, engagement and emotional safety in the learning environment.\n\nIt also contributes to the creation of inclusive and equitable learning experiences, as it can be personalised to respond to each student´s rhythms, strengths and challenges, including those related to memory, numeracy or socio-emotional development. \n\n# Aligning strengths (from wiki)\n\nCommunication and Interaction Strength\n\nSome learners with learning difficulties and disabilities often excel at verbal and listening communication and connecting with people. Depending on which form the feedback is given in (verbal, digital, graphic,…) and who gives it, it can be considerably more helpful for the learner's progress.\n\nBehavioural Strengths, Learning Strengths\n\nSome students may have stronger self-motivational and self-regulational abilities due to their condition and being used to facing and overcoming challenges. This strengthens with formative feedback in that they know what to work on and what they're good at. The former provides a direction to focus their efforts, and in some cases, great imagination and innovative solution skills; the latter supports their inner motivation to reach the intended goal.","HTML":"

Description of the strategy

\n

Formative feedback is a continuous and interactive strategy that provides students with specific guidance to improve while learning is still in progress.

\n

Rather than focusing on grades, it helps students understand what they are doing well, what needs improvement, and how to move forward.

\n

The strategy fosters self-regulation, critical reflection, and awareness of personal progress, making it especially effective in inclusive classrooms.

\n

This feedback can come from various sources and aims to motivate learners, clarify their current position, and guide them toward their learning goals.

\n

Further, it helps teachers adapt their teaching based on the learners' needs. After all, it's intended to be helpful for both parties.

\n

According to Hattie, to be efficient, feedback requires an activity and a product.

\n

Estimated Effectivity

\n

Effect size refers to the magnitude of the impact of formative feedback on student learning. It is a measure of how much a student´s performance or understanding improves as a direct result of receiving formative feedback.

\n

Formative assessment methods have some of the highest effect sizes found in education. High - quality feedback has more effect on the weakest learners.

\n

In Hattie's study, students receiving feedback of any kind on their work has an effect size of 0.81.

\n

In Marzano's article, giving students feedback on the processes and strategies they were using to complete a specific task has an effect size of 0.74.

\n

Underlying Ideas

\n

According to John Hattie and Shirley Clarke, feedback can be undertsood as "information about the task that fills a gap between what is understood and what is aimed to be understood".

\n

Socioconstructivism: feedback is based on the idea that knowledge is constructed through social interaction. In this sense, feedback activates cognitive and metacognitive processes and becomes a tool for mediating learning.

\n

Zone of proximal development theory of Vygotsky: feedback can be placed just above the learner´s current level, offering support for progress

\n

Universal Design for Learning (UDL): Feedback should be individualised, clear and understandable for each learner, adapted to their abilities and learning styles.

\n

Potential Challenges, Risks or Limitations

\n

Challenges: it requires time and teacher formation to be effective; it may not be understood or interpreted correctly by learners; if poorly implemented, it can lead to dependency rather than autonomy and, in environments with a high content load or high ratios, it can be difficult to implement in a consistent and personalised way.

\n

Four main risks:

\n\n

Also, if not handled carefully, it can:

\n\n

Needs supported by the strategy (from wiki)

\n

The strategy responds to the need for support in executive functioning by helping learners develop self-monitoring and self-regulation skills. It guides students in identifying their mistakes, recognising their achievements and planning the next steps. This again helps foster greater independence and a sense of ownership of the learning process.

\n

Next, it also addresses the need for support in communication, social interaction and participation, as it turns assessment into a dialogic and collaborative process. Here, learners are not passive receivers of information but rather active participants in their own development.

\n

Further, it is closely linked to motivational needs. By clarifying expectations and recognising progress, it helps to maintain motivation, engagement and emotional safety in the learning environment.

\n

It also contributes to the creation of inclusive and equitable learning experiences, as it can be personalised to respond to each student´s rhythms, strengths and challenges, including those related to memory, numeracy or socio-emotional development.

\n

Aligning strengths (from wiki)

\n

Communication and Interaction Strength

\n

Some learners with learning difficulties and disabilities often excel at verbal and listening communication and connecting with people. Depending on which form the feedback is given in (verbal, digital, graphic,…) and who gives it, it can be considerably more helpful for the learner's progress.

\n

Behavioural Strengths, Learning Strengths

\n

Some students may have stronger self-motivational and self-regulational abilities due to their condition and being used to facing and overcoming challenges. This strengthens with formative feedback in that they know what to work on and what they're good at. The former provides a direction to focus their efforts, and in some cases, great imagination and innovative solution skills; the latter supports their inner motivation to reach the intended goal.

","UPDATEDAT":"2025-04-24T11:53:15.245Z","ID":"3711ac95-046f-4818-85bb-444f81e21045","TITLE":"Formative Feedback"}