{"CACHEDAT":"2026-06-05 17:56:02","SLUG":"pantic-petar-2RGe3zadKO","MARKDOWN":"# Lesson title: When Energy Becomes Power\n\n## Lesson sequence title: Energy battle\n\nLesson no. 3 / 4\n\n### SSI: Should we continue using fossil fuels for industrial needs\n\n# Subject: History\n\n## Subject-specific learning goals / competences / curriculum content\n\n* understand how fossil fuels supported industrialization and economic growth;\n* explain the connection between energy resources, industry and political power;\n* analyze how dependence on coal, oil or gas can influence relations between countries;\n* examine historical and current examples of energy dependency;\n* compare economic benefits of fossil fuels with political, social and environmental consequences;\n* identify how wars, sanctions and trade disruptions can affect industrial production;\n* discuss how energy choices shape national independence, industrial competitiveness and global influence.\n\n## Learner age range: 14-15\n\n## Year of subject learning: 4th year\n\n# Lesson context before / after HOW activity\n\nBEFORE: \\nStudents first discuss why fossil fuels were important for industrial development; coal, oil and gas made factories, transport, electricity production and mass production possible. The lesson then moves from industrial history to political history; students explore how countries that depend on imported energy can become politically vulnerable.\n\nThey are introduced to a simple idea: energy dependency can become political dependency. If one country controls the fuel that another country needs for factories, heating, transport or electricity, it can use that position as pressure. This can happen through price increases, reduced supply, sanctions, pipeline control or trade restrictions.\\n\\nAFTER:\\nAfter the activity, students discuss how energy dependency can affect national independence, industrial stability and international relations. They reflect on whether continuing to use fossil fuels for industrial needs gives countries security, or whether it creates new risks when those fuels come from politically powerful suppliers.\n\n\n\\\n# HOW Activity\n\n## Duration in minutes: 15\n\n## MSL Domain: Speak out and take action\n\n### Learning goal: Students will objectively inform others about the risks of fossil fuel dependency and argue persuasively whether industrial use of fossil fuels should continue.\n\n\n### HOW: !!HOW!!\n\n## HOW activity instruction\n\nBefore showing the posts, remind students that not all misinformation looks obviously false. Some misleading claims use emotional language, official-looking design, selective facts or reliable sources taken out of context.\n\nDivide students into 5 small groups. Give each group a posts and ask them to analyze them using three questions:\n\n* What is the main claim of the post?\n* What makes the post seem believable?\n* Is the information missing, exaggerated or misrepresented?\n\nStudents should mark if the manipulation feature in each post exists, for example emotional appeal, biased framing, omission, false authority, false certainty or misuse of a reliable source. Two articles are actually correct. \n\nAfter group work, lead a class discussion. Ask students which post was the most convincing and why. Then guide them toward the key historical idea: energy dependency can become political dependency when a country relies on another country for fuel needed by factories, transport, heating or electricity.\n\nTo finish, students write one short objective sentence and one persuasive sentence.\n\n### Suggested social form\n\ngroup work\n\n### Required infrastructure\n\n* classroom with projector or smart board;\n* internet access, if the posts are shown digitally;\n* printed copies of the 3 fictional posts, if students work offline;\n* student worksheet with guiding questions;\n* pens or markers for highlighting manipulation features;\n* board or flipchart for collecting answers;\n* short teacher explanation of energy dependency and political dependency;\n* optional: tablets or phones for group work, if school rules allow it.\n\n\n##  \n\n\n \n\n[https://tdcenter.org/2024/11/07/european-energy-policy-and-security-in-light-of-russias-war-in-ukraine](https://tdcenter.org/2024/11/07/european-energy-policy-and-security-in-light-of-russias-war-in-ukraine/?utm_source=chatgpt.com)\n\n[https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/how-did-the-eu-respond-to-the-2022-energy-crisis](https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/how-did-the-eu-respond-to-the-2022-energy-crisis/?utm_source=chatgpt.com)","HTML":"
Lesson no. 3 / 4
\nBEFORE:
Students first discuss why fossil fuels were important for industrial development; coal, oil and gas made factories, transport, electricity production and mass production possible. The lesson then moves from industrial history to political history; students explore how countries that depend on imported energy can become politically vulnerable.
They are introduced to a simple idea: energy dependency can become political dependency. If one country controls the fuel that another country needs for factories, heating, transport or electricity, it can use that position as pressure. This can happen through price increases, reduced supply, sanctions, pipeline control or trade restrictions.
AFTER:
After the activity, students discuss how energy dependency can affect national independence, industrial stability and international relations. They reflect on whether continuing to use fossil fuels for industrial needs gives countries security, or whether it creates new risks when those fuels come from politically powerful suppliers.
Before showing the posts, remind students that not all misinformation looks obviously false. Some misleading claims use emotional language, official-looking design, selective facts or reliable sources taken out of context.
\nDivide students into 5 small groups. Give each group a posts and ask them to analyze them using three questions:
\nStudents should mark if the manipulation feature in each post exists, for example emotional appeal, biased framing, omission, false authority, false certainty or misuse of a reliable source. Two articles are actually correct.
\nAfter group work, lead a class discussion. Ask students which post was the most convincing and why. Then guide them toward the key historical idea: energy dependency can become political dependency when a country relies on another country for fuel needed by factories, transport, heating or electricity.
\nTo finish, students write one short objective sentence and one persuasive sentence.
\ngroup work
\n