{"CACHEDAT":"2026-04-14 02:44:03","SLUG":"d3-d4-inclusion-suggestions-pc45sBoVlM","MARKDOWN":"\n\n\n***==added suggestions / changes highlighted in green==***\n\n\n# `D3` Make up your mind ==→ SSI==\n\n## Evaluate the alignment of viewpoints / positions with the established scientific knowledge base.\n\n\n:::tip\n### `D3G2O1` Assess the degree of scientific consensus regarding specific empirical claims related to an SSI.\n\n* `D3G2O1H2` Distinguish between central superordinate empirical claims and subordinate ones addressing specific aspects.\n * *e.g. Human activities contribute to global warming. vs. The magnitude of warming by 2100 will be X–Y degrees.*\n* `D3G2O1H2` Compare findings from multiple scientific sources addressing the same claim.\n * *Search for meta-analyses or systematic reviews.*\n * *Identify official position statements from globally recognised scientific bodies.*\n * *Look for large-scale expert surveys.*\n* `D3G1O1H2` Determine the degree of expert agreement regarding claims.\n * *Assess the ratio of peer-reviewed literature.*\n * *Use tools like Google Scholar / Web of Scientce to see if the dissenting view is represented in 1% or 40% of published papers.*\n* `D3G1O1H2` Classify claims as strongly established, moderately established, or contested.\n\n:::\n\n\n:::tip\n### `D3G1O2` Summarise established scientific knowledge related to an SSI.\n\n* `D3G1O1H1` Identify the mechanisms described in authoritative scientific sources experts agree on.\n* `D3G1O1H1` Organise findings in a coherent overview.\n* ==Identify if minoritized voices/perspectives are represented in the established scientific discourse.==\n* ==Check whether the information/source (e.g., websites) is accessible and what exclusions it may produce (language level, disability access, paywalls, technical access...).==\n\n:::\n\n\n:::tip\n### `D3G1O2` Analyse the scope of scientific uncertainty related to empirical claims related to an SSI.\n\n* `D3G1O1H1` Classify types of uncertainty in conflicting studies in order to identify the level of uncertainty (where data exist but experts disagree). → D2\n * *incomplete data, model limitations, competing interpretations, limited expert discussions*\n* `D3G1O1H1` Identify unresolved questions (where data is currently missing).\n* `D3G1O1H2` Explain how uncertainty affects interpretation of evidence.\n\n:::\n\n## `D3G2` Analyse the multidimensional nature of the SSI (\"full picture\")\n\n\n:::tip\nCategorise the controversy as scientific and/or social. \n\n:::\n\n\n:::tip\n### Analyse main drivers behind the SSI.\n\n* `D3G2O2H2` Identify the main drivers behind the SSI across the different dimensions [☑](https://wiki.scilmi.eu/doc/make-up-your-mind-xWFLDEKwb8#h-checklist) \n* `D3G2O2H3` Select the categories that are relevant to have a discussion on the SSI [☑](https://wiki.scilmi.eu/doc/make-up-your-mind-xWFLDEKwb8#h-checklist)\n* `D3G2O2H3` \n\n:::\n\n\n:::tip\n### `D3G2O2` Analyse the stakeholder structure of the SSI.\n\n* `D3G2O2H2` Identify parties benefitting in relation to the SSI.\n* `D3G2O2H3` Identify parties bearing risks or costs.\n* `D3G2O2H3` Identify decision-makers and regulatory actors.\n\n:::\n\n\n:::tip\n### `D3G2O1` Analyse the impacts of the SSI.\n\n* `D3G2O1H1` Categorise impacts ☑\n* `D3G2O1H1` Distinguish short-term and long-term impacts.\n* `D3G2O1H1` Distinguish local and global impacts.\n* `D3G2O1H2` Distinguish positive and negative impacts.\n* ==Determine specifically how context diversity influences impact relevance across different categories.==\n* ==Determine which aspects of context diversity (socio-economic conditions, locality, political structure...) are represented in the relevant impact group.==\n\n:::\n\n\n:::tip\n### `D3G2O2` Analyse proposed responses to the SSI.\n\n* `D3G2O2H2` Identify proposed policy measures. ☑\n* `D3G2O2H3` Identify technological alternatives.\n* `D3G2O2H2` Identify nature-based solutions. ☑\n* `D3G2O2H3` Identify behavioural or societal changes.\n* `D3G2O2H3` Compare solutions in terms of feasibility.\n* ==Identify which aspects determine solution feasibility -> are they immutable?==\n\n:::\n\n## D3G3 Viewpoints & Trade-Offs / Interactions\n\n\n:::tip\nbroaden discussion beyond the human perspective: treating nature as a legal entity → considering its rights to stay alive\n\n:::\n\n\n:::tip\n### `D3G1O1` Evaluate the viewpoints on the SSI against the scientific knowledge. \n\n* `D3G1O1H1` Collect different viewpoints across stakeholders supported by evidence-based arguments. <- D2\n* `D3G1O1H2` Identify omissions in how the viewpoints represented established knowledge and uncertainty.\n* Identify exaggerations in how the viewpoints represented established knowledge and uncertainty.\n* `D3G1O1H3` Assess whether the viewpoints proportionally represent the degree of scientific certainty and uncertainty.\n* `D3G1O1H4` Classify the viewpoints as strongly aligned, partially aligned, or weakly aligned with the current scientific knowledge base.\n* ==Assess if minoritized voices/perspectives are currently being heard in the general discourse.==\n* ==Identify missing voices/perspectives.==\n* ==Identify common assumptions represented in the general discourse.==\n\n:::\n\n## `D3G4` Weigh your viewpoint / position in light of the trade-offs across different dimensions of the SSI.\n\n\n:::tip\n### `D3G4O1` Identify your position / viewpoint.\n\n* `D3G4O1H1` ☑ Personal relation to the SSI\n* ==Identify your stakeholder position in regard to context diversity.==\n* ==Identify personal needs affecting your desired discussion outcome.==\n* ==Summarize your personal viewpoint on the SSI.==\n* ==Determine how your viewpoint is represented in the SSI discourse.==\n\n \\\n\n:::\n\n# `D4` Speak out and take action ==→ civic competences==\n\n## `D4G1` Design a plan for your civic engagement to address the socio-scientific issue.\n\n\n:::tip\n### `D4G1O1` Identify opportunities to engage (potential WHEREs).\n\n* ==Identify the specific needs you would like to address.==\n* ==Identify the group whose needs you would like to address.==\n* ==Engage and consult with representatives of your target group.==\n* ==Summarize and compare existing efforts addressing these needs to identify gaps: What works/what doesn't?==\n* ==Identify risks of participation: How do identity/context/role... affect the safety of expressing my opinion?==\n\n:::\n\n\n:::tip\n### `D4G1O2` Determine the impact you would like to have (WHY).\n\n* ==Determine target recipients of your civic engagement.==\n* ==Specify which level of engagement you would like to achieve (informing, sparking discussion, taking action...).==\n* `D4G1O2H3` Weigh the effect of potential forms of engagement.\n\n:::\n\n\n:::tip\n### `D4G1O3` Select the most appropriate communication channel(s) to disseminate your message on the pertinent socio-scientific issue and/or identify an action or initiative (WHERE).\n\n* ==Determine your recipients' communication requirements.==\n* ==Choose a communication channel that is accessible to all recipients.==\n* ==Take group representatives' feedback into account when picking and adjusting your communication channel.==\n\n:::\n\n\n:::tip\n### `D4G1O4` Prepare for potential feedback and reactions.\n\n* Review similar initiatives and summarize common feedback and reactions and determine the factors provoking them.\n* Analyze if your target group's response is likely to be influenced by the same factors.\n\n:::\n\n## `D4G2` Communicate established viewpoints on a socio-scientific issue: Inform.\n\n\n:::tip\n### `D4G2O2` ==Inform about different== viewpoints on the socio-scientific issue.\n\n* `D4G2O2H1` Organise the arguments and supporting evidence.\n* Report facts and provide context.\n* Process sources to make them accessible for your target group\n\n:::\n\n## `D4G3` Communicate your viewpoint on a socio-scientific issue: Argue.\n\n\n:::tip\n### `D4G3O1` Define your [message.]()\n\n* `D4G3O1H1` Formulate a clear statement on the socio-scientific issue in a single sentence.\n* `D4G3O1H2` Identify a hook to grab the recipients' attention\n* `D4G3O1H3` Provide background information on the socio-scientific issue.\n* `D4G3O1H4` Explain ☑ how the evidence supports the arguments and ☑ how the arguments support your message.\n\n:::\n\n\n:::tip\n### `D4G3O2` Tailor your message to the target audience regarding their previous knowledge, interests and language skills.\n\n* ==Assess diverse levels of previous knowledge in your target group.==\n* ==Assess diverse levels of linguistic competence in your target group.==\n* ==Assess general areas of interest and motivation in your target group.==\n* `D4G3O2H3` (Re)formulate your arguments using the appropriate register, style, and linguistic structure for the given context.\n\n:::\n\n\n:::tip\n### `D4G3O3` Invalidate potential counter-arguments.\n\n* `D4G3O3H1` Identify likely counter-arguments.\n* `D4G3O3H4` Develop a response and prepare alternate arguments and evidence to support your message.\n\n:::\n\n## `D4G4` Take action to become a responsible democratic citizen.\n\n\n:::tip\n### `D4G4O1` Select an action or initiative.\n\n* ==Suggest appropriate actions and initiatives based on your message.==\n* ==Discuss possible actions and initiatives with target group representatives.==\n* ==Identify action or initiative best suited for inducing change under the analyzed circumstances.==\n\n:::\n\n\n:::tip\n### `D4G4O2` Make a plan to execute.\n\n* `D4G4O2H1` Outline steps and a timeline.\n* `D4G4O2H2` Determine success criteria ==→ What changes are you expecting to observe?==\n\n:::","HTML":"
added suggestions / changes highlighted in green
\nD3 Make up your mind → SSID3G2O1 Assess the degree of scientific consensus regarding specific empirical claims related to an SSI.D3G2O1H2 Distinguish between central superordinate empirical claims and subordinate ones addressing specific aspects.D3G2O1H2 Compare findings from multiple scientific sources addressing the same claim.D3G1O1H2 Determine the degree of expert agreement regarding claims.D3G1O1H2 Classify claims as strongly established, moderately established, or contested.D3G1O2 Summarise established scientific knowledge related to an SSI.D3G1O1H1 Identify the mechanisms described in authoritative scientific sources experts agree on.D3G1O1H1 Organise findings in a coherent overview.D3G1O2 Analyse the scope of scientific uncertainty related to empirical claims related to an SSI.D3G1O1H1 Classify types of uncertainty in conflicting studies in order to identify the level of uncertainty (where data exist but experts disagree). → D2D3G1O1H1 Identify unresolved questions (where data is currently missing).D3G1O1H2 Explain how uncertainty affects interpretation of evidence.D3G2 Analyse the multidimensional nature of the SSI ("full picture")Categorise the controversy as scientific and/or social.
D3G2O2 Analyse the stakeholder structure of the SSI.D3G2O2H2 Identify parties benefitting in relation to the SSI.D3G2O2H3 Identify parties bearing risks or costs.D3G2O2H3 Identify decision-makers and regulatory actors.D3G2O1 Analyse the impacts of the SSI.D3G2O1H1 Categorise impacts ☑D3G2O1H1 Distinguish short-term and long-term impacts.D3G2O1H1 Distinguish local and global impacts.D3G2O1H2 Distinguish positive and negative impacts.D3G2O2 Analyse proposed responses to the SSI.D3G2O2H2 Identify proposed policy measures. ☑D3G2O2H3 Identify technological alternatives.D3G2O2H2 Identify nature-based solutions. ☑D3G2O2H3 Identify behavioural or societal changes.D3G2O2H3 Compare solutions in terms of feasibility.broaden discussion beyond the human perspective: treating nature as a legal entity → considering its rights to stay alive
D3G1O1 Evaluate the viewpoints on the SSI against the scientific knowledge.D3G1O1H1 Collect different viewpoints across stakeholders supported by evidence-based arguments. <- D2D3G1O1H2 Identify omissions in how the viewpoints represented established knowledge and uncertainty.D3G1O1H3 Assess whether the viewpoints proportionally represent the degree of scientific certainty and uncertainty.D3G1O1H4 Classify the viewpoints as strongly aligned, partially aligned, or weakly aligned with the current scientific knowledge base.D3G4 Weigh your viewpoint / position in light of the trade-offs across different dimensions of the SSI.D3G4O1 Identify your position / viewpoint.D3G4O1H1 ☑ Personal relation to the SSID4 Speak out and take action → civic competencesD4G1 Design a plan for your civic engagement to address the socio-scientific issue.D4G1O1 Identify opportunities to engage (potential WHEREs).D4G1O2 Determine the impact you would like to have (WHY).D4G1O2H3 Weigh the effect of potential forms of engagement.D4G1O3 Select the most appropriate communication channel(s) to disseminate your message on the pertinent socio-scientific issue and/or identify an action or initiative (WHERE).D4G1O4 Prepare for potential feedback and reactions.D4G2 Communicate established viewpoints on a socio-scientific issue: Inform.D4G2O2 Inform about different viewpoints on the socio-scientific issue.D4G2O2H1 Organise the arguments and supporting evidence.D4G3 Communicate your viewpoint on a socio-scientific issue: Argue.D4G3O1 Define your [message.]()D4G3O1H1 Formulate a clear statement on the socio-scientific issue in a single sentence.D4G3O1H2 Identify a hook to grab the recipients' attentionD4G3O1H3 Provide background information on the socio-scientific issue.D4G3O1H4 Explain ☑ how the evidence supports the arguments and ☑ how the arguments support your message.D4G3O2 Tailor your message to the target audience regarding their previous knowledge, interests and language skills.D4G3O2H3 (Re)formulate your arguments using the appropriate register, style, and linguistic structure for the given context.D4G3O3 Invalidate potential counter-arguments.D4G3O3H1 Identify likely counter-arguments.D4G3O3H4 Develop a response and prepare alternate arguments and evidence to support your message.D4G4 Take action to become a responsible democratic citizen.D4G4O1 Select an action or initiative.D4G4O2 Make a plan to execute.D4G4O2H1 Outline steps and a timeline.D4G4O2H2 Determine success criteria → What changes are you expecting to observe?